Gay Massage London Percival- Statistics

Age- 24 y.o.

Height- 182 cm. (5 ft.11in.)

Weight- 74 kg. (163 lbs.)

Physique- slim & athletic

Ethnicity- British

Availability- weekdays & weekends, morning, afternoon, & evenings.

Tatoos- yes

For more information, or to schedule a Gay Massage London appointment with Percival, contact Dr. Garrett directly by email at docgarrett@spankingfit.com

or fill out the following form. Specify “Masseur Percival” in the subject field

For a complete portfolio of London massage therapists-

London Knights Massage Gay/ Straight – Spanking FIT!

Don’t forget to catch my interview on JOCKSTRAP SPANKING with acclaimed Aussie sports/ fitness trainer Austin Edwards- Jockstrap Spanking – Spanking FIT!

For information on the mythological character Percival-

List of Arthurian characters – Wikipedia

Gay Massage London Percival

Welcome to our new website Spanking FIT which is a spanking new approach to staying informed about personal fitness and health, based on REAL Science. Notice, I said “our” website and not “my” website. There’s a reason for this:  Although I possess degrees including a  doctorate from the world’s most prestigious universities, and have years of experience researching health and fitness issues, I  truly want Spanking FIT to be our collective effort.  After all, nobody knows more about their body than you do. Rather than being one of the many online fitness and health “gurus”, I view myself as a coordinator of the collective wisdom of our website’s visitors. However, I do wish to make an important contribution by using years of personal experience in medical/ health data analysis to assist in separating fact from fiction. It will come as no surprise to the reader that false claims and exaggerations regarding fitness and health abound in media. What may surprise you, however, is one common source of them:  so-called peer-reviewed papers that are published in well regarded scientific journals!  The authors of this research, no matter how well intentioned, often disregard important requirements regarding the nature of the data they use in making their “discoveries” and in publishing their “findings”. For this reason, you cannot rely on a medical or health-related claim simply because it has been published in a journal. This is a common mistake made by many popular websites. Yes, even by fine quality publishers like New York Times (https://www.nytimes.com/). With your assistance, I plan to detect those cases, and introduce the necessary note of caution. There’s also an abundance of medical opinion and claims by credentialed persons that are based on anecdotal evidence only. Statements to the effect of: “in my twenty five years of clinical practice I have never seen a case of such and such, etc.” can be equally damaging and misleading for the public.  I plan to detect and warn about those as well.